Early production for qualified capture teams

Pursue the right deal.Engineer the right proposal.

IntentBid helps government contractors and serious proposal teams score opportunities, clear a pre-flight readiness gate, and generate evidence-backed responses calibrated to evaluator criteria. Faster output, tighter control, no autopilot.

Bid / no-bid scoring firstPre-flight readiness gateEvidence-backed and human-reviewed
Live opportunity review
DHS Zero Trust Modernization BPA
Pursue — 82 / 100
Pre-flight readiness gate
Clear the blockers before drafting
2 blockers
Relevant past performance attached
IntentBid matched 3 related efforts from Company Profile.
Pass
Named program manager missing
Resume and certification package required for key personnel section.
Blocker
Rate realism checked
Labor categories fall within recent benchmark bands.
Verified
Evidence pack
Company truth ready for generation
Past performance
VA cloud migration, DISA zero trust pilot, and civilian agency help desk modernization.
Certifications
ISO 27001, CMMI, cleared personnel, and small-business set-aside status.
Review mode
Weak claims, thin proof, and evaluator-risk language flagged before export.

Winning is not just about what you can do. It's whether you pursue the right bid, prove the claim, and survive review.

IntentBid makes those decisions explicit before the deadline crush: qualify the opportunity, close the evidence gaps, then engineer the response around evaluator criteria.

Built for real capture work
15Parallel proposal
generation pipelines
9,451Federal awards
in the intelligence dataset
1,007Labor-rate benchmarks
available to the workflow
100%Human-reviewed
before submission

IntentBid is in early production with qualified teams and active hardening underway. We ship against live deal pressure and real review friction, not a hypothetical demo script.

EP
Early production releaseBuilt with qualified capture teams and bid managers

The wedge is not generic AI writing. It is proposal engineering: better pursuit decisions, better proof discipline, and better review signals before the team submits anything.

PE
Proposal engineering focusDesigned for evaluators, reviewers, and capture teams
The Workflow Difference

The proposal is not the first decision.

Most teams start writing too early. IntentBid makes pursuit, readiness, evidence, and review explicit before your team commits the week.

Pursuit

Manual / legacy pathStart drafting because the RFP landed in the inbox.
With IntentBidScore pursue, watch, or skip before the team burns a week.

Readiness

Manual / legacy pathFind missing proof, resumes, or rate issues halfway through the draft.
With IntentBidRun a pre-flight gate before generation starts.

Evidence

Manual / legacy pathClaims assembled from memory and scattered folders.
With IntentBidApproved company truth and past performance matched to each section.

Review

Manual / legacy pathManual QA at the end, under deadline pressure.
With IntentBidWeak sections and unsupported claims surfaced before submission.

Memory

Manual / legacy pathEach proposal starts from scratch.
With IntentBidAgency, evidence, and outcome memory compound across every bid.
IntentBid Intelligence

Know which deals to chase
before you write a word.

Proposal writing is only half the battle. IntentBid Intelligence gives capture teams the market context, benchmarks, and public-record workflows that make pursuit decisions sharper and proposal strategy more defensible.

Opportunity Discovery

Search live solicitations across agencies, jurisdictions, and verticals. Filter by NAICS, set-aside, due date, and value, then move the right opportunity into the workflow with one click.

Pursue / Watch / Skip Scoring

Every opportunity is scored across fit, readiness, proof density, timeline feasibility, and strategic value. Get a visible recommendation before the team commits capture hours.

Agency and Vehicle Fit

See how agencies buy, what contract vehicles matter, and where your profile fits the buying office. Use real procurement context instead of guesswork.

Agency Win Patterns

See incumbents, award cadence, average award size, and comparable historical patterns so your team enters the bid with clearer expectations.

Competitive Landscape

See who wins in your market, where incumbents dominate, and how award value and set-aside patterns shift across the landscape.

Rate and Labor Benchmarks

Understand labor-category distributions, rate ranges, and pricing context before you finalize cost assumptions or narrative claims.

Powered by USAspending.gov, GSA CALC+, and public procurement sources. Intelligence flows into scoring, readiness, and proposal engineering — not just a dashboard.

What improves when the workflow is engineered

Decide before
you draft.

The first win is not wasting proposal capacity on the wrong deal. IntentBid scores fit, capacity, agency context, and strategic value so capture teams can pursue, watch, or skip with visible rationale.

Pursuit recommendation
Pursue
82
Capability fit, relevant proof, workable timeline.
Watch
61
Good fit, but vehicle or staffing uncertainty remains.
Skip
34
Thin fit, weak proof, or poor strategic value.

Clear the gate
before generation.

The strongest proposal teams find the missing pieces early. IntentBid surfaces proof gaps, missing personnel artifacts, benchmark risks, and compliance issues before your draft starts multiplying them.

Pre-flight checklist
Section L / M requirements extracted
Evaluator criteria mapped and visible to the team.
Pass
Key personnel package incomplete
Resume and clearance evidence missing for one named role.
Blocker
Labor categories benchmarked
Rate realism checked against recent public benchmarks.
Verified

Turn proof into
proposal memory.

IntentBid does not start from zero. Company Profile, past performance, certifications, named personnel, and prior outcomes become reusable building blocks that strengthen the next bid.

Company profile memory
Past performance library
Tagged by agency, domain, labor category, and outcome.
Named personnel and resumes
Pull cleared staff, certifications, and bios into the right sections.
Outcome learning loop
Mark wins and losses so the next proposal starts smarter.
Human-in-the-Loop

Fast enough for deadlines.
Controlled enough for serious teams.

IntentBid is never autopilot. Humans make the pursuit decision, resolve blockers at the readiness gate, and approve every section before export. The AI accelerates capture work; it does not own the submission.

01
You decide whether the deal is worth chasing. Pursue, watch, or skip based on visible scoring instead of inbox pressure.
02
You clear the readiness gate. Missing proof, resumes, rate issues, and compliance blockers are surfaced before generation begins.
03
You review every section before submission. Accept, edit, or regenerate. Nothing leaves the platform without human sign-off.
YouSelect the opportunity
IntentBidScore fit + readiness
YouApprove pursuit
IntentBidEngineer the draft
YouReview, approve, submit
The 6-layer engine

Six controls between your source documentsand reviewer-ready output.

This is the moat: not one-shot generation, but layered proposal engineering that pushes every section toward evaluator trust.

LAYER 01

Evaluator Criteria

Section L and M requirements mapped into the structure before drafting begins.

LAYER 02

Company Truth

Capabilities, resumes, certifications, and past performance pulled from approved source material.

LAYER 03

Win Themes

The differentiators that matter most to this evaluator repeated with discipline.

LAYER 04

Persuasion Structure

Section-specific argument patterns used where they strengthen the decision, not just the prose.

LAYER 05

Competitive Context

Positioning shaped by incumbents, alternatives, and what the buying office already expects.

LAYER 06

Review Feedback

Weak claims, thin proof, and risky language surfaced before export and submission.

intentbid-engine
Processing evaluator criteria...
<Context>
Extracting Section L/M requirements... OK
Loading evaluator factors and weighting... OK
Re-ordering the section to match the published rubric...
Elevating discriminators tied to technical merit
Flagging unsupported claims before the draft proceeds
</Context>
The Comparison

Built for evaluators, not just editors.

The point is not more text. It is better pursuit decisions, tighter proof, and proposals that survive scrutiny.

Manual ProcessHidden labor cost

Word, SharePoint, copy-paste

Tribal and deadline-driven

No explicit pursuit gate, weak reuse, and review happens too late.

Content Library Suites$20K–100K+/yr

Loopio, Responsive

Retrieval-first

Strong for finding old answers, weaker for bid qualification and evaluator-aware generation.

Generic AI Copilots$20–100/mo

ChatGPT, Jasper, generic AI

General-purpose generation

Fast text, but no company truth, readiness gate, or proposal-specific controls.

Everyone Else
IntentBid
Pursuit decision
Starts after the team already committed to writing
Pursue / watch / skip scoring before capture hours get burned
Readiness gate
Missing proof discovered mid-draft
Pre-flight checks surface blockers before generation starts
Evidence
Claims built from memory and file shares
Approved company truth and past performance mapped into the workflow
Evaluator alignment
Generic sections or rigid templates
RFP-specific calibration to evaluator criteria and review logic
Human control
Manual chaos or black-box autopilot
AI draft with explicit human approval before submission
Intelligence
Little or no procurement context
Agency patterns, benchmarks, FOIA workflows, and competitor context
Request Access
Pricing

Start with a live deal, not a generic trial.

Start at $19.99/run for a real opportunity, move into Growth for repeatable team workflow, and add Intelligence when procurement context and benchmarks need to show up in every bid.

See Full PricingSee It With Your RFP